Dit is een week-end opdracht voor een paper van max 3 A4, 1,5 regelafstand, derdejaars studenten universteit? Het moet over de actuele geopolitieke situatie gaan?
- Zo is het.
Mogen ze Ai erbij gebruiken?
- Bij voorkeur zelfs! Belangrijk is dat ze de juiste literatuur erbij zoeken en vinden. En natuurlijk moeten ze een goed verhaal op papier zetten, en ….. geen plagiaat, uiteraard. Ze moeten tonen over inzicht te beschikken en weten wat ze zoeken.
Y en jij hebben dit voorbeeld in nog geen uur in elkaar gestoken. Wow! Eigenlijk is het een open-boek-proefwerk. Die zijn ook zo bedriegelijk, kan ik me herinneren; degenen die de stof beheersten maakten het op hun sloffen, de anderen ontdekten dat ze de boeken en literatuur toch maar beter tevoren hadden kunnen bestuderen.
- Zo is het maar net.
Dat jullie Ai-gebruik stimuleren, is ook tamelijk ongebruikelijk. De studenten verdringen zich wel om bij jullie een plek te bemachtigen. ‘Het amusementsgehalte is hoog en je léért er ook nog veel van!’
- Dat is toch een mooie formule: leuk en leerzaam?
Hoe kwamen jullie op de fabel-formule?
- Wel, de cartoon gaat over dieren, apen, fabels van Lafontaine gaan ook over dieren en ze hebben een moraal, én we konden verifiëren of we de juiste Ai-medewerker aan de lijn hadden, want dat kan ook nog schelen.
Politiek-met-een-moraal. Dat klinkt in ieder geval goed.
Did I [= Ai] verify with Frans de Waal’s work?
Yes — the statements about orangutan social structure are consistent with established primatology, including the work of Frans de Waal, though with an important nuance:
– De Waal writes extensively about chimpanzees, bonobos, and macaques, because those species are deeply social and hierarchical — perfect for studying politics among primates.
– Orangutans appear less often in his political-behavior analyses precisely because they don’t form the same kind of dominance hierarchies.
So the claim that orangutans are “the least hierarchical” and “mostly solitary” is not something de Waal argues against — it’s a widely accepted fact in primatology and is consistent with his broader framework, even if orangutans are not his main focus.
*
www.livemint.com/news/trends/punch-the-monkey-is-winning-over-the-internet-here-s-why-people-are-in-love-11771601915434.html
*
🐾 The Gorilla, the Monkey, and the Orangutan: A Satirical Fable
🦍 The Gorilla’s Grand March
One fine morning, the Gorilla announced:
“Today, I shall lead the forest! Not because anyone asked me to, but because I am very large and enjoy the sound of my own footsteps.”
He puffed out his chest so far that two parrots had to swerve mid‑flight to avoid colliding with his ego.
🐒 The Monkey’s Master Plan
Perched on the Gorilla’s back, the Monkey rubbed his tiny hands together.
“Excellent! A moving throne! A mobile platform for my brilliance!”
He leaned into the Gorilla’s ear and whispered:
“Go left. No, right. No, left again. Trust me — I have absolutely no idea where we’re going, but it will look very impressive.”
The Gorilla nodded solemnly, as if receiving ancient wisdom instead of random monkey chatter.
🦧 The Orangutan’s Unfortunate Morning
Meanwhile, the Orangutan was minding his own business, practicing the ancient art of “doing nothing in particular,” when the Gorilla grabbed him by the arm.
“You will join my march!” the Gorilla declared.
“Why?” asked the Orangutan.
“Because,” said the Gorilla, “every great leader needs someone to demonstrate how great he is by dragging them around.”
The Orangutan sighed. He had hoped for a quiet day of fruit, shade, and existential contemplation. Instead, he was being used as a prop.
🐒 The Monkey Offers Advice
As they trudged along, the Monkey shouted down:
“Try to look more grateful! You’re being included in history! Well… in his version of history.”
The Orangutan replied:
“I didn’t ask to be included.”
“Exactly!” said the Monkey. “That’s what makes it historic!”
🦍 The Gorilla Reflects (Briefly)
After several hours of marching, the Gorilla noticed the Orangutan was dragging his feet.
“Why are you slowing down?” he demanded.
“Because,” said the Orangutan, “I am being dragged.”
The Gorilla blinked. This was a revelation.
“I thought you were following me because you admired my leadership.”
“I was following you,” said the Orangutan, “because you were holding my arm and you weigh as much as a small boulder.”
The Gorilla scratched his head. Leadership was turning out to be more complicated than he expected.
🐒 The Monkey Flees
Sensing the Gorilla’s confusion, the Monkey decided it was time to abandon ship.
He leapt into a tree and declared:
“I must go! I hear another large creature in need of unsolicited advice!”
And with that, he vanished.
🦧 The Orangutan’s Parting Words
Freed from the Gorilla’s grip, the Orangutan stretched his arm and said:
“Next time you want to lead, try asking if anyone wants to follow.”
The Gorilla nodded slowly.
“That sounds… difficult.”
“It is,” said the Orangutan. “But it’s easier than dragging everyone.”
Moral
A leader who marches alone is merely exercising. A leader who drags others is merely exhausting. A leader who listens might actually lead.
* * *
🦍 Gorilla → The Dominant Protector
Primate traits
– Strong, imposing, central figure in a group
– Leads through physical presence rather than political maneuvering
– Protective but also capable of coercion
Human archetype
The Patriarch / The Strongman / The Enforcer A figure who believes they must lead, protect, or control — sometimes benevolently, sometimes forcefully.
Narrative role
– Embodies authority, stability, and dominance
– Represents power that is felt rather than negotiated
🐒 Chimpanzee → The Politician
Primate traits
– Highly strategic
– Forms alliances, coalitions, and rivalries
– Navigates complex hierarchies
Human archetype
The Schemer / The Diplomat / The Political Operator Someone who survives and thrives through negotiation, manipulation, and social intelligence.
Narrative role
– Embodies ambition, rivalry, and tactical thinking
– Represents the “game of power”
🦧 Bonobo → The Peacemaker
Primate traits
– Conflict-averse
– Uses affiliation and bonding to maintain harmony
– Female-centered social structure
Human archetype
The Mediator / The Idealist / The Harmonizer A figure who seeks connection, empathy, and peaceful resolution.
Narrative role
– Embodies cooperation and compassion
– Represents an alternative to dominance-based power
🟧 Orangutan → The Outsider
Primate traits
– Solitary
– Non-hierarchical
– Intelligent but not politically engaged
Human archetype
The Exile / The Innocent / The Independent A figure who stands apart from the power struggles of others — sometimes by choice, sometimes by force.
Narrative role
– Embodies vulnerability or detachment
– Represents someone caught in a system they didn’t create and can’t control
*
🟧 Why the orangutan choice is so pointed
Orangutans are:
– solitary
– gentle
– non‑hierarchical
– symbolically “out of place” in political struggles
So the orangutan signals:
– vulnerability without political agency
– a being displaced from its natural context
– a figure who cannot fight back, negotiate, or form alliances
This makes the power imbalance feel:
– starker
– more morally charged
– more about domination than politics
*
